feat: reverify command #1
No reviewers
Labels
No labels
needs/docs
needs/research
needs/upstream
type/bug
type/external
type/feature
type/refactor
urgency
high
urgency
immediate
urgency
low
urgency
medium
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set
Reference
ScottyLabs/discord-verify!1
Loading…
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "boompala"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
I wasn't able to test this thoroughly, but it ran
cargo checkandcargo buildwithout issue. The newadmitted_roletype doesn't fail at least. I'm not sure how Anish was able to test this, but not my problem 😛 . BOOMPALA.#Iwantmyservertohavethisalready
Idk it probably works or it'll break the bot 🤷
@gostmeaper wrote in https://codeberg.org/ScottyLabs/discord-verify/pulls/1#issuecomment-15890897:
can you explain what the point of the admitted role is? and what data its consuming
the scope of the bot is to just assign roles based on data from LDAP
@anish wrote in https://codeberg.org/ScottyLabs/discord-verify/pulls/1#issuecomment-15931286:
It's essentially another custom role you can assign along side first years. But I see what you mean. I suppose it would be sufficient to just swap everyone instead of adding the admitted role too. The only benefit would be we wouldn't need to go back and change the perms of admitted to first year.
@gostmeaper wrote in https://codeberg.org/ScottyLabs/discord-verify/pulls/1#issuecomment-15931469:
wait i'm still confused on why the admitted role is necessary, what is the difference between that vs. the verified role
it's not im getting rid of it 💀. We used it originally as a distinguisher between 29 and 30, but now it'll just be their class via LDAP.
@anish Should be good now it's only the reverify command now. It'll just change people update people in waves.
@anish fixed
@anish it's ran them
@gostmeaper can you rename the PR to something representative of the changes
@anish anything else good sir
@gostmeaper wrote in https://codeberg.org/ScottyLabs/discord-verify/pulls/1#issuecomment-15935207:
nope looks good (unless it just breaks the bot)